17. Inheritance of resistance to gallmidge in rice

V.N. SAHU1, R. MISHRA2, B.P. CHAUNHARY1, P.S. SHRIVASTAVA1, and M.N. SHRIVASTAVA1

1) Department of Plant Breeding, Indira Gandhi, Agric. University, Raipur, 492 012, India

2) Department of Plant Breeding, Jawaharlal Nehru Agric. University, Jabalpur, 482 004, India

Gall midge (Orseolia oryzae Wood-Mason) is one of the major pests of rice, Oryza sativa L. It is known to occur extensively in several South and Southeast Asian and African countries.

Host plant resistance has been suggested to be most economical and logical approach to control this pest since chemicals have not been found very effective (Khush 1977; Heinrichs and Pathak 1981). Occurence of more than one biotype has added a new dimension to the problem necessitating the identification of as many

Table 1. Rice cultivars used in the study and their reaction to gall midge.

================================================================
Parent           Source            Number of Plants    Reaction
                                   ================
                                       R    S
================================================================
Samridhi         IR22/W1263           120   0            R
Surekha          IR8/Siam29           120   0            R
Shakti           Ptb21/Ptb18//IR8      77   2            MR
Cult.245         natural cross        120   0            R
Kodakuri         M.P.,India           120   0            R
Jalpa            M.P.,India           120   0            R
Bahawar kanak    M.P.,India           115   5            MR
Kalimoonch 64    M.P.,India           120   0            R
ARC 5984         Assam,India           75   0            R
ARC 6632         Assam,India           75   0            R
Ranijakar        M.P.,India            0  120            S
R 2270           B11/TN1               0  120            S
TNI              DGWG/Tsaiyuan-chung   0   60            S
================================================================
R = resistant, S =susceptible, MR =moderately resistant.
sources of resistance as possible to cope-up with the situation. Considerable progress has been made in identifying donors for resistance (Bhat et al. 1958 ; Roy et al. 1969; Kalode et al. 1977; Heinrichs et al. 1985), and some information has been obtained on the inheritance of resistance. Choudhary et al. (1986) identified two dominant genes designated as GM-1 and Grn-2. In th's study we investigated the inheritance of resistance in several additional cultivars.

Ten resistant parents were studied (Table 1). Two of these, viz, Samridhi and Surekha are semi-dwarfs having already defined genes, Gm-1 and GM-2 respectively (Choudhary et al. 1986). Shakti and Cult. 245 are also semi-dwarfs. The remaining six parents are tall and were obtained from the germplasm collection maintained at Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur. All resistant parents, except Shakti and Bahawar kanak have shown high resistance under field conditions. Shakti and Bahawar kanak continued to show a few silver shoots even after purification on single plant basis and thus were classified as moderately resistant. The crosses were made between resistant and susceptible parents as well as between resistant parents. The susceptible parents used were Ranikajar, TNl and R2270.

The F1 and F2 populations of crosses listed in Tables 2 and 3 were screened during wet season of 1986 under field conditions. All efforts were made to develop adequate pest pressure. The sowing of test material was delayed to third week of August to coincide with active tillering phase of the crop with peak population period of the pest. Two rows of highly susceptible purple leaf cultivar, R259-WR37-2 were planted all around the screening plots and also between F1 and F2 populations. The live silver shoots and infected plants were brought from farmers

Table 2. Segregation for resistance to gall midge in crosses between resistant and susceptible varieties (wet season 1986)

================================================================
                           Reaction to gall midge
                   =============================================
Cross              F1                 F2                X2
                        ==============================
                            R       S      Ratio        3:1
================================================================
Samridhi/Ranikajar  R       334     131     3:1         2.49
Surekha/Ranikaja    R       429     146     3:1         0.05
ARC 6632/R 2270     R       127      43     3:1         0.01
TN1/Shakti          S       103     342     1:3         0.81
ARC 5984/R 2270     S        26      74     1:3         0.05
Kalimoonch 64/R2270 S       254     813     1:3         1.92
================================================================
     R=resistant, S=susceptible.

Table 3. Reaction to gall midge of F2 populations from the crosses between
resistant parents (1986 wet season)

================================================================
                          Reaction to gall midge
                   =============================================
Cross              F1                 F2                X2
                       ===============================
                          R1        S      Ratio        3:1
================================================================
Surekha/Kodakuri   R      273       0      1:0           -
Surekha/Jalpa      R     1065       0      1:0           -
Surekha/B. kanak   R      528       0      1:0           -
Surekha/Cult. 245  R     1094       0      1:0           -
Kodakuri/Jalpa     R      281       0      1:0           -
Kodakuri/B. kanak  R      828       0      1:0           -
Jalpa/B. kanak     R      957       0      1:0           -
ARC 5984/Samrichi  R       78      14     13:3          0.75
ARC 5984/Surekha   R      100      22     13:3          0.04
================================================================
R=Resistant; S=Susceptible.
fields and were planted in test plots. Electric lamps were provided during night hours to attract insects.

As the data of Table 2 show, the resistance of Samridhi and Surekha was found to be under the control of a single dominant gene. This is in conformity with the results reported earlier (Choudhary et al. 1986). The F2 population from the cross ARC 6632/R2270 segregated in a ratio of 3 resistant to 1 susceptible thereby showing that a single dominant gene confers resistance in ARC 6632. On the other hand F2 populations from the crosses TN1/Shakti, ARC 5984/R2270 and Kalimoonch 64/R2270 segregated in a ration of 1 resistant to 3 susceptible plants thereby showing that single recessive genes confer resistance in Shakti, ARC 5984 and Kalimoonch 64.

Four resistant varieties, e.g., Kodakuri, Jalpa, Bhawar kanak and Cult. 245 were found to have Gm-2 as there was no segregation for susceptibility in the F2 populations of their crosses with Surekha (Table 3). The F2 populations froin the crosses of ARC5984 with Samridhi and Surekha segregated in a ratio of 13R: 3S thereby showing that the recessive gene of ARC 5984 segregates independently of Gm-1 and Gm-2. This gene is designated as gm-3. The allelic relationships of the recessive genes of Shakti and Kalimoonch 64 with gm-3 need to be investigated. Similarly, the allelic relationships of the dominant gene of ARC 6632 with Gm-1 and Gm-2 should be investigated.

References

Bhat, M. V., G. A. Patel and M. A. Gokavi, 1958. Investigations of paddy gall midge (Pachydiplosis oryzae W-M). II Varietal resistance to the gall midge. Indian J. Entomol. 20: 21-26.

Choudhary, B. P., P. S. Shrivastava, M. N. Shrivastava and G. S. Khush 1986. Inheritance of resistance to gall midge in some cultivars of rice. In Rice Genetics, p. 523-528. International Rice Research Institute, P. 0. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.

Heinrichs, E. A. and P. K. Pathak 1981. Resistance to the gall midge Orseolia oryzae (Wood- Mason) in rice. Insect Sci. Appl. 1: 123-132.

Heinrichs, E. A., F. G. Medrano and H. R. Rapusas, 1985. Genetic evaluation for insect resistance in rice. International Rice Research Institute, P. 0. Box 933, Manila, Philippines. p. 356.

Kalode M. B., T. S. Krishna, D. J. Pophaly and A. Lakshminarayana, 1977. Note on new donors having multiple resistance to major insect pests of rice. Indian J. Agri. Sci. 47: 626-627.

Khush, G. S. 1977. Breeding for resistance in rice. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 287: 296-308.

Roy, J. K., P. Israel and M S. Panwar, 1969. Breeding for insect resistance in rice. Oryza 6: 38-44.