V.Genetics of disease and
insect resistances
33.Enhanced resistance against blast and sheath blight by combinational
Biotechnology Research Center, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou
510275, China
Blast and sheath blight diseases
are prevalent in all rice-growing countries and cause significant yield
losses. Magnaporthe grisea, the causal agent of blast, has a variety of
physiological races, which mutate easily. No single rice variety shows
resistance to all isolates or races. Naturally resistant germplasm for
sheath blight has not been found in cultivated rice plants nor in its wild
relatives. Resistance breeding to blast and sheath blight is not feasible.
Therefore, biotechnology approaches are valuable in introducing genes which
encode antifungal proteins against Magnaporthe grisea and Rhizoctonia solani
(Lin et al. 1995). Plants possess a variety of mechanisms to protect themselves
from pathogen attack and abiotic stress, suggesting that different protection
mechanisms may have complementary roles in the overall expression of resistance.
Transgenic tobacco plants co-expressing chitinase/glucanase or chitinase/ribosome
inhibitor protein revealed significantly enhanced protection compared to
plant lines expressing a single transgene (Zhu eta!. 1994; Jach et a!.
1995).
To evaluate the potential effect
of a “multi-transgene” tolerance strategy, we co-introduced a rice basic
chitinase gene, RC24, an alfalfa glucanase gene, beta-Glu, and a barley
ribosome-inactivating protein gene, B-RIP, into an indica rice variety,
Qisiruanzhan, by the biolistic method. Fertile independent transgenic lines
were obtained with variable levels of chitinase and glucanase gene expression.
Southern blot analysis showed that the inheritance of RC24 and (beta-Glu
transgenes in Tl, T2 generation behaved as a monogene with a ratio close
to 3:1. However, B-RIP transgenes in other plasmids were not always genetically
linked with the RC24 and beta-Glu transgenes. Ten different homozygous
lines containing RC24/beta-Glu and ten different homozygous lines containing
RC24/beta-Glu/BRIP were obtained in their T2 generations.
These transgenic rice plants were
assayed for resistance to fungal pathogen attack with Magnaporthe grisea
and Rhizoctonia solani. The data showed an increased protection against
infection by both pathogens, and the degree of resistance displayed correlated
with the level of foreign gene expression. Blast resistance test results
for part of the transgenic rice plants are shown in Table 1. Eighteen isolates
belonging to ten dominant races of Magnaporthe grisea in the Guangdong
province were tested. Our results indicate that 44.4% (R%) of the control
showed resistance, while 55.6-.88.9% of T3 homozygous transgenic lines
containing RC24/beta-Glu/B-RIP transgenes displayed resistance, and 55.6-100%
of T3 homozygous transgenic lines containing RC24/beta-G1u transgenes displayed
resistance. Among these plants, transgenic line Q3-3-9 showed more resistance
than all three control rice varieties, including the resistance control
rice variety, Sanhuangzhan. The results indicate synergistic protective
interaction against Magnaphorthe grisea and Rhizactonia solani of the co-expressed
antifungal proteins in transgenic rice plants. Following field tests, several
resistant transgenic rice plants have now been selected.
disease scale 0-3. MR represents moderate resistance, disease
scale 4.
in Guangdong. MR% represents the frequencies of moderate
resistance to eighteen different isolates of M. grisea in Guangdong. R%=HR%+MR%.
tain the RC24/beta-Glu transgenes. Among these, lines Q3-3-9
showed stronger resistance when compared to the resistance control (RCK),
Sanhuangzhan.
Acknowledgments
We thank Yang Qiyun and Thu Xiaoyuan, Plant Protection Institute,
Guangdong Province, Academia Sinica, for testing resistance to Magnaphorthe
grisea.
References
INGER, 1990. The Twentieth International Rice Blast Nursery.
Published by the IRRI, Manila, Philippines.
Jach, G., B. Fornbardt, J. Mundy, J. Logemann, E. Pinsdorf,
R. Leah, J. Schell and C. Maas, 1995. Enhanced quantitative resistance
against fungal disease by combinatorial expression of different barley
antifungal proteins in transgenic tobacco. Plant J. 8: 97-109.
Lin, W., C.S. Aunratha, K. Datta, I. Potrykus, S. Muthukrishnan
and S.R. Datta, 1995. Genetic engineering of rice for resistance to sheath
blight. BiolTeclmology 13: 686-691.
Zhu. Q., E.A. Maher, S. Masoud, R.A. Dixon and Ci. Lamb,
1994. Enhanced protection against fungal attack by constitutive co-expression
of chitinase and glucanase genes in transgenic tobacco. BioiTechnology
12:807-812.
|