D. J. Mackill, Z. Zhang and E. D. Redona
USDA-ARS and Department of Agronomy & Range
Science, University of California, Davis, CA
95616. USA
RFLP maps developed at Cornell (Causse et al.
1994), and in Japan (Kurata et al. 1994) continue to
form the basis of gene mapping research in rice. Polymprphism is highest
between members of the indica and japonica subspecies, and
most mapping studies utilize indica x japonica crosses. Unfortunately,
inter-subspecific crosses suffer from sterility and distorted segregation
(Wang et al. 1994). RAPD markers (Welsh and McClelland 1990; Williams
et al. 1990) have been proposed as an alternative to RFLPs. Within
the japonica subspecies, RAPDs have been shown to be polymorphic
between the tropical and temperate types (Mackill 1995), and have recently
been used to construct a genetic map in a tropical x temperate japonica
cross (Redona and Mackill, this issue). As with RFLPs, however, the level
of polymorphism is relatively low within japonica rices, and many primers
are needed for mapping quantitative trait loci. Microsatellite (or simple
sequence repeats-SSR)(Akkaya et al. 1992) and amplified fragement
length polymorphism (AFLP)(Zabeau and Vos 1993) markers have been proposed
for gene mapping in species where RFLPs are limited. Studies in rice indicate
that microsatellite markers are highly polymorphic (Wu and Tanksley 1993;
Zhao and Kochert 1993; Yang et al. 1994). Information on polymorphism
of AFLP markers in rice is currently not available. In the present study,
we compared the levels of polymorphism of AFLP, RAPD and microsatellite
markers on 12 japonica cultivars and 2 indica cultivars.
For RAPD markers, 21 primers gave 43 polymorphic bands; and for AFLP markers,
17 primer combinations gave 140 polymorphic bands. The 10 microsatellite
markers were based on sequences of Dr. Susan McCouch, Cornell University.
All marker types gave the same classification of
the rice accessions into subspecies. Both RAPDs and AFLPs agreed on classification
of japonica rices into tropical and temperate types. Within japonica
cultivars, the average percent polymorphism was 22% for AFLP, 24% for RAPD,
and 36% for microsatellite markers, respectively (mo-nomorphic bands excluded).
While the percent polymorphism was highest for microsatellite markers,
the abundance and ease of using RAPDs indicate that this marker can be
used for mapping within japonica rice. For example, Redona and Mackill
(submitted and in this issue) used RAPDs to map QTLs in a temperate x tropical
japonica cross. The average percent polymorphism between indica
and japonica accessions was 31, 35 and 76%, for AFLP, RAPD and microsatellite
markers, respectively. While the percent polymorphism was lowest for AFLPs,
the number of polymorphic bands was much higher, averaging over eight per
gel (Fig. 1 ).
We mapped AFLP markers produced by seven primer
combinations on 80 F2 plants of the japonica/indica cross
Labelle/Black Gora used by Redona and Mackill (1994). Of 54 bands scored,
50 could be mapped, and these appeared to be distributed throughout the
rice genome (3 on chromosomel, 1 on chr.2, 6 on chr.3, 4 on chr.4, 4 on
chr.5, 8 on chf.6, 3 on chr.7, 5 on chr.8, 3 on chr.9, 5 on chr.l0 and
8 on chr.l1). This indicates that AFLPs are a promising marker for mapping
important genes in indica x. japonica crosses.
Fig. 1. AFLP autoradiographs of 14 rice cultivars using two primer combinations. The First 14 lanes are from primer combination 92S04/92G12 and the second 14 are from primers 93B11/92F06. Cultivars are 1=M-103, 2=M-201, 3=M-202, 4=M-203, 5=M-204, 6-M-401, 7=ltalica Livorno, 8=L-202, 9=L-203, 10= Labelle. ll=BlackGora, 12=IR40931-26, 13=87-Y-550, 14=WC1403. Entries 11 and 12 are indica types and the others are japonica types. Both primers are +3 bases. Amplified bands were labelled with 33. P and run on sequencing gels.