M. Maheswaran 1,3, D. J. Mackill2,
Ning Huang 1, S. R. Sreerangasamy3 and S. R. McCouch4
1. Genome Mapping Laboratory,
PBGB, IRRI
2. USDA-ARS, Dept of Agronomy
& Range Science, University of California, USA
3. Tamilnadu Agricultural
University, Coimbatore, India
4. Department of Plant Breeding
and Biometry, Cornell University, lthaca, USA
The genetic analysis done on different cross combinations
of photopeirod insensitive and sensitive rice varieties revealed the presence
of two genes viz, Se-I and .Se-3(t) controlling photopeiod sensitive
phase and critical day length respectively. Kinoshita (1986) reported that
photoperiod sensitivity gene Se-I is closely linked with isozyme
marker Pgi-2. Based on this report Pgi-2 alleles were used
to determine if any of the genes conferring photoperiod sensitivity were
allelic to Se-I. Results indicated that Puang Rai 2, Sac Nau, and
Nam Saugi 19 all had a dominant gene conferring sensitivity at the Se-I
locus, (Poonyarit et al., 1989). The details of the parents and
progenies involved in
Table 1. The parents involved in gene tagging for photoperiod sensitivity | ||||
Parent | Origin | Duration | Genotype | Phenotype |
IR 26760-27 | IRRI | 145 | se lse 1 Se 3 Se 3 | weakly sensitive |
Nam Saugi 19 | Thailand | 122 | Se ISe 1 se 3 se 3 | weakly sensitive |
Puang Rai 2 | Thailand | 193 | Se I Se 1 Se 3 Se 3 | strongly sensitive |
Sac Nau | Vietnam | 190 | Se ISe 1 Se 3 Se 3 | strongly sensitive |
tagging genes conferring photoperiod sensitivity and critical day length
are given in Table 1.
For tagging the Se-3(t) gene with RAPD markers
using the bulked segregant analysis (Michelmore et al. 1991), F3
lines derived from two F2 populations were used. These populations
were: 38 F3 lines from Puang Rai 2/Nam Saugi 19 and 48 F3
lines from Sac Nau/Nam Saugi 19 studied by Poonyarit et at.
(1989). Phenotyping of F3 populations of Puang Rai 2/Nam Saugi
19 and Sac Nau/Nam Saugi 19 was carried out in the greenhouse under long
day length to distinguish homozygotes and heterozygotes of sensitive F3
families. The number of days to flowering of the weakly sensitive parent,
Nam Saugi 19, was used as a threshold to differentiate the homozygotes
and heterozygotes of sensitive groups of both crosses. Among the F3
families of sensitive group, families segregating for individuals flowering
along with weakly sensitive parent (Nam Saugi 19) and strongly sensitive
parents (Sac Nau or Puang Rai 2) were found. Based on the segregation of
F3 families, the individual homozygous or heterozygous
nature of individual F2 plant was decided. Out of 15 sensitive
F3 families of the cross Puang Rai 2/Nam Saugi 19 and 23 sensitive
F3 families of Sac Nau/Nam Saugi 19, a total of three and eight
families, respectively, segregated for days to flowering. The F2
plants corresponding to these families were identified as heterozygous.
Equal numbers of homozygotes of both sensitive and
insensitive classes, along with the parents were used for the bulked segregant
analysis with RAPDs. Of the 435 random primers (Operon Tech. Inc.) surveyed
a single linked primer, A-19 was identified. This primer generated 9 bands
2 of which were putatively linked to Se-3, one associated with weak
sensitivity and other with strong sensitivity. Further, the putative marker
identified in Sac Nau/Nam Saugi 19 cross was monomorphic in Puang Rai 2/Nam
Saugi 19 cross (Fig. 1).
The putative markers to weak sensitivity and strong
sensitivity were designated as A 19-1 and A19-S respectively. To confirm
the putative linkage of the markers with phenotypes, DNA from 48 F3 DNA
families were used. The marker for weak sensitivity (A 19-1) was found
in 13 out of 23 strongly sensitive families of which 8 were segregating
for strong sensitivity and weak sensitivity. The A19-1 was found in all
the 25 weakly sensitive families. The marker for strong sensitivity (A19-S)
was found in 21 out of 23 strongly sensitive families and 7 out of 25 weakly
sensitive families. The linkage analysis between the respective marker
and the phenotype indicated that the putative marker,
References
Kinoshita, T., 1986. Standardization of gene symbols and linkage maps
in rice. In: Rice Genetics, International
Rice Research Institute,
Los Banos, Philippines pp.21.S-228.
Mackill, D. J., M. A. Salam, Z. Y. Wang and S. D. Tanksley, 1993, A
major photoperiod sensitivity gene tagged
with RFLP and isozyme markers
in rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 536-540.
Poonyarit, M., D. J. Mackill and B. S. Vergara, 1989. Genetics of photoperiod
sensitivity and critical day length
in rice. Crop Sci., 29:
647-652.