I. The Importance of Disease-Resistant Genes (R Genes) in Plants
Resistance of a plant to a pathogen is often correlated with a hypersensitive response, such as localized, induced cell death in the host plant at the site of infection. In gene-for-gene interactions between a plant and a pathogen. resistance is expressed only when a plant containing a specific R gene recognizes a pathogen that has the corresponding avirulence gene (for a review, see Staskawicz et al. 1995). Physiological features of hypersensitivity include a rapid oxidative burst. K+-H+ exchange, crosslinking of plant cell wall. synthesis of antimicrobial compounds such as phytoalexins. and induction of pathogenesis-related proteins such as chitinases and glucanases (Lamb et al. 1989). The mechanism by which these events limits the growth of specific pathogens has not yet been elucidated.
Avirulence genes corresponding to specific R genes were cloned from bacterial and fungal pathogens ten years ago (Staskawicz et al. 1984: Gabriel et al. 1986). However. since little is known about the protein products of R genes in plants, the isolation and cloning of R genes remains difficult. In fact. the first R gene in plants was not cloned until 1992 (Johal and Briggs 1992).
Cloning plant R genes opens the door for producing disease-resistant crop plants in two ways. First, by using cloned R genes as probes, plant breeders can monitor R gene segregation more readily for disease resistance and susceptibility. Moreover, the cloned R genes can be used to facilitate the identification and introgression of new resistances from wild plant species. Second, using direct genetic engineering of crop plants by transforming specific R gene(s) into plants, one can produce disease-resistant plants with relative ease.
II. Methods for Cloning Disease-Resistant Genes (R Genes) from Plants
There are two general ways to clone an R gene. or any gene. when no information is available about the gene product: insertional mutagenesis and map-based cloning.
A. Insertional mutagenesis—In this method, a fragment of DNA
is inserted into the coding region or regulatory region of a gene.
which results in the disruption
of the gene expression. After the insertional mutagenesis. the next step
is to clone the plant DNA
that flanks the integrated
insertional mutagen by plasmid rescue. The cloned plant DNA can be used
as a hybridization probe to
isolate the gene by screening
a lambda or cosmid library constructed from the wild-type plant. If the
gene of interest is a
disease-resistant gene,
the final test for the gene tagged by this method is to introduce the cloned
gene from the disease-resistant
plant by transforming sensitive
plants and examining them in order to determine whether they have become
disease-resistant.
1. The most commonly used DNA molecules for insertional mutagenesis
are transposons. Fortunately, members of the maize Ac and
Spm transposon families
function when transferred into heterologous plant species. This attribute
allows for efficient gene-tagging
systems in a variety of
plants specific for tagging and cloning genes of interest (Baker er al.
1986).
2. Another commonly used insertion mutagen is the T-DNA from the Ti
plasmid. After infection of plant cells by Agrobacterium,
T-DNA plus any gene (such
as the NPTII gene) inserted between the 25-base pair borders that flank
the T-DNA become
integrated into the plant
genome. After selection with kanamycin. a certain percentage of the resistant
plant lines exhibited a
mutant phenotype as the
result of gene disruption.
B. Map-based cloning—In map-based cloning (also known as positional
cloning), one needs to first determine the approximate
chromosomal location of
a gene of interest. The most frequently used method for linking the chromosomal
location to a particular
trait, such as resistance
to a specific disease in a plant, is to make use of restriction fragment
length polymorphism (RFLP).
Co-inheritance of the disease
resistance trait with one or several specific RFLP DNA probes defines the
approximate location of
the R gene on a specific
chromosomal region. The linkage between several specific DNA probes and
the R gene allows one to
use the DNA probes as starting
points to walk to. or to land on. the R gene. The R gene is provisionally
identified after screening
for coding sequences (e.g..
cDNAs) within the specific region, preferably cloned in a yeast artificial
chromosome (YAC) vector
or a bacterial artificial
chromosome (BAC) vector. Finally, verification of the putative R gene can
be determined by genetic
complementation tests after
transforming the candidate cDNA fragments into susceptible plants and after
looking for the
acquisition of disease resistance
in the transgenic plants. Alternatively, the R gene can be verified by
isolating mutants in the R
gene and comparing the mutant
sequences with the wild-type sequence,
III. Molecular Characterization of Several Disease-Resistant (R) Genes
A. Identification of R genes by insertional mutagenesis—
1. The first plant R gene to be cloned by insertional mutagenesis was the maize Hml
References
Baker, B., J. Schell. H. Lorz. and N. Fedoroff. 1986. Transposition
of the maize controlling element "Activator"
in tobacco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 4844-4848.
Bent, A. F., B. N. Kunkel, D. Dahibeck. K. L. Brown. R. Schmidt. J.
Giraudat. J. Leung. and B. 1. Staskawicz 1994. RPS2 of
Arabidopsis thaliana: a leucine-rich repeat class of plant disease resistance
genes. Science 265:1856-1860.
Ellis, J. G., G. J. Lawrence, E. J. Finnegan, and P. A. Anderson, 1995.
Contrasting complexity of two rust
resistance loci in flax. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 4185-4188.
Gabriel, D. W., A. Burge,. and G. R. Lazo, 1986. Gene-for-gene interactions
of five cloned avirulence genes from
Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearum with specific resistance genes in
cotton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:
6415-6419.
Grand, M. R., L. Godiard. E. Straube, T. Ashfield, J. Lewald, A. Sattler,
R. W. Innes, and J. L. Dangl, 1995. Structure of the
Arabidopsis RPMI gene enabling dual specificity disease resistance. Science
269: 843-846.
Jones, D. A., C. M. Thomas, K. E. Hammond-Kosack, and J. D. G. Jones,
1994. Isolation of the tomato Cf-9
gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum by transposon tagging. Science
266: 789-793.
Johal, G. S., and S. P. Briggs, 1992. Reductase activity encoded by
the HMI disease resistance gene in maize.
Science 258:985-987.
Lamb, C. J., M. A. Lawton, M. Dron, and R. A. Dixon, 1989. Signals
and transduction mechanics for activation
of plant defenses against microbial attack. Cell 56: 215-224.
Martin, G. B., S. H. Brommonschenke, J. Chunwongse, A. Frary, M. W.
Ganal, R. Spivey, T. Wu, E. D. Earle,
and S. D. Tanksley, 1993. Map-based cloning of a protein kinase
gene conferring disease resistance
in tomato. Science 262:1432-1436.
Mindrinos, M.. F. Katagiri, G.-L. Yu. and F. M. Ausubel, 1994. The
A. thaliana disease-resistant gene RPS2 encodes a protein
containing a nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeats. Cell 78:
1089-1099.
Song, W.-Y., G.-L. Wang, L-L. Chen, H.-S. Kim, T. Holsten, B. Wang,
W.-X.Zhai, L.-H. Zhu, C. Fauquet. and P.
Ronald. 1995. The rice disease resistance gene. Xa-21. encodes a receptor
kinase-like protein. In press.
Staskawicz, B. J., D. Dahibeck, and N. T. Keen, 1984. Cloned avirulence
gene of Pseudomonas syringae pv.
glycinea determines race-specific incompatibility on Glycine max(L.) merv.
Proc. Natl. Sci. USA 81: 6024-6028.
Staskawicz, B. J., F. M. Ausubel. B. J. Baker. J. G. Ellis. and J.
D. G. Jones. 1995. Molecular genetics of plant
disease resistance. Science 268: 661-667.
Whithman, S., S. P. Dionesh-Kumar, D. Choi, R. Hehl, C. Con-, and B.
Baker. 1994. The product of the tobacco
mosaic virus resistance gene N: similarity to toll and the inierleukin-1
receptor. Cell 78: 1101-1115.
Wu, R.. K. S. Reece. and M. McCann. 1987. Analysis of genes from rice.
In Z. Li and M. S. Swaminathan (eds.).
Proceedings of the first international symposium on chromosome engineering
in plants. October 20-25.
1986. p. 141-150. Xian. China.